ETD: 804 What is a "brand?"; Technology Encyclopedia - RFID;
American Express Luxury Survey
E-Tailer's Digest
etd_post at gapent.com
Tue Jul 27 11:24:13 GMT 2004
E-Tailer's Digest --- Everything for the Retailer
Issue #0804 July 27, 2004
George Matyjewicz, Moderator mailto:georgem at gapent.com
Published by: GAP Enterprises, Ltd. http://www.etailersdigest.com
==================================================================
CONTENTS
[1] Greetings
[2] What is a "brand?"
[3] Technology Encyclopedia - RFID
[4] American Express Luxury Survey
==================================================================
[1] Greetings.
==================================================================
Hi All:
Over the weekend I was speaking to an artist who wants to sell his art
work. Which got me to question his comment "that's my brand." So I posed
the question to Market-L. The thoughts apply to any product or
service. What do you think?
List member Jan Owens is co-authoring a technology article on RFID and has
some interesting comments. IMHO, RFID will become part of our lives, much
the same as bar codes are now. We see it every day as we travel on some
highways where they have the EZ-Pass express lanes (travel through at
normal speeds). The issue now is when?
Pam Danziger has authored a survey with American Express on the luxury
market. Interesting material. Two key items - travel and fine
dining. Looks like an opportunity for a luxury dining cruise to exotic
places, eh?
Tell us about your business which will remain for posterity at
our "Members: Who Are You?"
site. http://etailersdigest.com/resources/members/index.htm And we have a
form there for you to tell us about you. As I said when I first proposed
this idea, we have "known" each other for a long time, yet we often don't
know anything about each other. So, tell us who you are and what you do.
Now, let's get to everything for the retailer.
Sincerely
George Matyjewicz, PhD
Chief Global Strategist, GAP Enterprises, Ltd.
mailto:georgem at gapent.com
http://www.etailersdigest.com
==================================================================
[2] What is a "brand?"
==================================================================
Over the weekend, I was talking to an artist who wants to sell his art
work. I told him to test some other pieces that he has, as the ones he is
trying to sell has a very limited market.
His reply: "I can't change; that's my brand."
So the big questions is do you have to sell to have a brand? What is a brand?
I posed this question to Market-L, the best marketing resource on or off
the net, and got some interesting comments. What do you think?
George
------------------º><º 1st reply º><º-------------------
You do not have to sell anything to be a brand. PanAm has ceased to exist
and yet is still a brand.
A brand is the set of values that dictate behavior. It is made of
temperament and character.
Temperament is what you were born with, i.e., the genes. Temperament
doesn't change. An Arabian horse is small and has a lot of endurance. Those
traits of the horse's temperament are a part of its brand.
Character is the system of values one forms from the experiences of life.
It can change but only slowly because changing it too fast may be construed
as a sign that you didn't hold dear the values you discard. That would be a
sign of absence of character...
When we work on brands in the business world we do not make the distinction
between temperament and character, but, for a painter, I think it would
work better.
Painters' styles change. Picasso had a cubist period before he developed
his own. Kandinsky did paint recognizable forms and figures before he
adopted a completely abstract style. The only part of their brand that
didn't change was their temperament i.e., their perception of light, of
colors etc.
But their character changed under the influence of life events such as the
Spanish Civil War and the many women in Picasso's life, for example.
Character and brands are inherently complex. They cannot be simple, based
on one or on a small number of values. The more values, the richer the
brand. Your painter has latched on a few of his values and doesn't dare
change them... In stead, he should be encouraged to explore all the values
that comprise his character. That will give him a richer brand in the end.
--
Jacques Chevron - Partner - JRC&A Consulting - JP Group
Branding Strategy and New Product Development
URL: http://JRCandA.com
------------------º><º snipped - next º><º-------------------
It seems to me that a brand resides in the minds of its beholders. That's
one of the reasons that, in most cases, companies and their products have
brands that are largely ambiguous. To the extent that a company can define
their brand and consistently design their offerings congruent to their
branding, they can be said to have a brand.
In the case that George cited, the artist doesn't really seem to have a
brand except in his own mind. Or, if enough prospective customers have
seen his work, then he probably does have a brand, but not one that has
been accepted.
------------------------------------
Jacques Werth, co-author
"High Probability Selling"
Read the first 4 chapters on-line at:
http://www.highprobsell.com
------------------º><º snipped - next º><º-------------------
IMHO, you don't have to sell to have a brand.
My understanding is that a brand is, in essence, the representation of the
character of the concern. If we use the example of a local high-school, for
example, their brand means to the general public a good place to learn and
a school that is very community oriented. While one could argue that they
are selling in terms of trying to get students, I've never once seen an ad,
other than the generic "we're having an open house, come see why we're a
good place to send your kids..."--certainly nothing that is trying to
reinforce their brand, such as an ad with testimonials, or statements such
as '<school> raised over $45,000 last year', etc.
It also comes to mind that every new company takes a while til it sells
it's first something (maybe not 10 years, but still...), but the branding
really starts from the moment the company comes into existence and others
start to learn about it through some form of marketing, albeit paid or word
of mouth.
My 2 cents.
Robert Mendelson
remdog99 at hotmail.com
------------------º><º snipped - next º><º-------------------
I was thinking the same thing. I think the artist assumes his "style" of
art is his "brand".
Think Pollock and the paint flecks... anytime I see it and that very 50's
color palette, I know it is Pollock. But that style has to be widely
recognized before it can be associated with the artists name... and does
that style just typecast the artist?
Marna Bungers
==================================================================
[3] Technology Encyclopedia - RFID
==================================================================
'By the way, my compliments on your coverage of RFID technology. I am
putting the polish on an encyclopedia article co-authored with two
operations faculty -- the article is headed for a technology
encyclopedia. For whatever reason, I have convinced them that it's not
just the technology itself, but how/why a retailer will be motivated to
purchase the systems that will determine how quickly RFID happens, and
factors inhibiting the adoption (NOT just the initial cost, but also its
reliability, application to the specific product, security and privacy
concerns, etc.) I'll send a copy in the next few weeks as I get the
sign-off from my co-authors.
While I think this is a wonderful technology, it still has some kinks
(signals distorted by products with certain metal components or some
liquids;) standards questions; relative cost and advantages predicted;
etc. Recently, the Defense Department backed off requiring their suppliers
to adopt RFID by a certain deadline as many manufacturers complained that
the cost to them was not justified by any efficiencies or
improvements. Largely, I think that RFID benefits retailers more than
manufacturers. Since Wal-Mart is such a powerful retailer and very
tech-savvy, RFID WILL happen, but it is mostly to their benefit in the near
future. The real problems of most manufacturers is demand prediction, as
it affects inventory management. However, high-ticket items that benefit
from in-transit monitoring (e.g. expensive pharmaceuticals) have
effectively used RFID more than low-ticket staples.
Like anything, making the sale is so much easier when the customer
understands WHY they WANT the product!
-- Jan Owens
==================================================================
[4] American Express Luxury Survey
==================================================================
Todays affluent consumers have a fresh perspective on the good life,
according to the American Express Platinum Luxury Survey, a new study of
the affluent consumer, conducted on the 20th anniversary of the Platinum
Card from American Express.
According to the survey, more than half of affluent consumers (59%) receive
the greatest personal satisfaction from experiences, such as fine dining,
travel, entertainment, cultural/arts events and sporting events. On
average affluent consumers spent $10,060 on these luxuries over the past 12
months. Only 21% of those surveyed say they get the greatest satisfaction
from personal luxuries, such as automobiles, fashion and jewelry and on
average they spent $14,270 on personal luxuries over the past 12 months.
Only 20% enjoy home luxuries most, such as furniture, kitchenware, and
linens and bedding and on average respondents spent $12,300 on home
luxuries over the past 12 months.
In the real world, affluent consumers aren't relaxing poolside or eating
bonbons, said Peggy Maher, senior vice president and general manager,
Consumer Charge Card, American Express Theyre working long hours,
juggling personal and professional lives, and are constantly pressed for
time. For instance, our affluent Cardmembers are looking to ease their
busy, often hectic, lives with experiences that will make them feel
special, whether it be a massage, a night out with fine dining and
entertainment, or taking a luxurious vacation abroad.
Twenty years ago the affluent lifestyle was focused on having and
obtaining more material things, but the new luxury paradigm finds
affluent consumers pursuing new life experiences, said Pam Danziger,
author of the book, Why People Buy Things They Dont Need, and President of
Unity Marketing, which conducted the American Express Platinum Luxury
Survey. Today, affluent consumers are far more interested in living well
and smartly rather than keeping up with the Joneses.
Fine Dining and Luxury Travel Top List of Experiences
Those survey respondents who said they value experiences most spent an
average of $26,401 on experiential luxury services in the past 12 months,
more than double that of all survey respondents. The most popular
experiences are fine dining and luxury travel.
The majority of these affluent consumers (79%) said fine dining was the
number one experience they enjoyed over the last 12 months. Over
three-fourths (76%) enjoyed fine dining once a month or more at a luxury
restaurant and spent on average $5,990 on dining in the past
year. However, food isn't everything when making fine dining decisions:
37% rate the reputation of the chef or restaurant as the top reason to
choose a restaurant, 33% select a restaurant based on service or getting a
good table, and 31% said outstanding restaurant reviews were the most
influential factor.
These affluent consumers also travel often and in style: more than
two-thirds (68%) took an average of six personal trips in the past year and
spent $12,650 on average on personal travel. And dont expect these
consumers to be logging into the office email and working on their
vacations. Relaxation is a top priority, with 47% citing relaxation and
freedom from stress as the top reasons for travel. Nearly all (90%) agreed
that traveling was a desirable way to break out of the day-to-day routine.
When the affluent travel, the majority (56%) said creating memorable
experiences was the most important vacation criteria. Almost half (45%)
received help over the past year creating those memorable moments with the
use of a travel agent, personal concierge or other personal
assistant. This allowed them to take advantage of special VIP programs,
gain insider access to special accommodations or obtain amenities available
only on an exclusive basis. Of those who took advantage of such VIP
services, 70% said these special programs greatly enhanced or somewhat
enhanced their travel experiences.
One fact to count on these affluent consumers plan to enjoy more
experiences in the future. Eighty-seven percent said they expect to spend
the same or more on fine dining in the next year and 81% said they expect
to spend the same or more on personal travel.
The American Express Platinum Luxury Survey includes a quantitative survey
among a random cross section of 870 affluent consumers in the U.S. with
household incomes of $100,000 and above and who purchased or enjoyed either
a home, personal or experience-based luxurye.g., fine dining, luxury
travel or entertainmentin the past 12 months. The average household
income of consumers surveyed was $175,000. In addition, 491 of those
respondents, who said they achieved the greatest satisfaction and happiness
through experience-based luxuries, participated in an in-depth survey that
explored experience-based luxury buying habits and attitudes.
Pam Danziger
www.unitymarketingonline.com
==================================================================
Links to follow
==================================================================
GAP Enterprises, Ltd. http://www.gapent.com/
Sarbanes-Oxley 2002 http://www.sarbanes-oxley2002.com
E-Tailer's Digest http://www.etailersdigest.com
ETD Archives: http://topica.com/lists/etailer/read
Prior to 29 Dec
1999 http://etailersdigest.com/archives/index.htm
Marketing Your Web http://www.gapent.com/myweb/
Automated Press Releases http://www.automatedpr.com
More information about the ETD
mailing list